Cases 41 - 50 of 293
Robinson v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Timya Robinson
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pachirat v. Instant Brands LLC
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Samantha Pachirat
Defendant:
Instant Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bouton et al v. Valvoline LLC
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Donald Bouton, Patricia Bouton and Dan Bouton
Defendant:
Valvoline LLC doing business as Valvoline Instant Oil Change 050032
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wilder v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
Suzette Wilder
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Karim v. Instant Brands Inc.
as 1:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
Khadija Karim
Defendant:
Instant Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Badders v. Instant Brands Inc
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Devin Edward Badders
Defendant:
Instant Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Horton v. National Instant Criminal Background Check System
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
John D. Horton
Defendant:
National Instant Criminal Background Check System
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lewis v. Instant Brands Inc
as 7:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Frank Lewis
Defendant:
Instant Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle M Wolcott
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COLES et al v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
RECINA COLES and TONY COLES, II
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc., INSTANT BRANDS, LLC and INSTANT BRANDS HOLDINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
