Cases 21 - 30 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv05009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Calvin Walker, et al v. Beaumont Indep School District, et al
as 17-40752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN GARY WALKER, WALKER'S ELECTRIC, WALKERS ELECTRIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BEAUMONT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, AARON COVINGTON, LEROY SALEME and others
Phillips v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv02227
Plaintiff:
Charity L. Phillips
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc., Tampa Police Department and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW 824)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michigan State AFL-CIO, et al v. William Schuette, et al
as 16-2100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHIGAN STATE AFL-CIO, UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA LOCAL 223, Local 223, GEORGE HORUCZI and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BILL SCHUETTE and RUTH JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michigan State AFL-CIO et al v. Johnson
as 4:2016cv11454
Plaintiff:
Michigan State AFL-CIO , Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Local 223 , George Horuczi and others
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson and William Schuette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1553
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Party - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
