Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dewan Wheeler v. Cook County Department of Corrections Mailroom, et al
as 23-1935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAN T. WHEELER
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MAILROOM, OFFICER SCOTT, Cook County Grievance Officer and COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS INVESTIGATION TEAM
Wheeler v. C.C.D.O.C. Mail Room et al
as 1:2022cv07002
Plaintiff:
Dewan Thearies Wheeler
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C. Mail Room, CRW Scott and C.C.D.O.C. Investigation Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUMZY v. THE DA'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2022cv23141
Plaintiff:
ACQUINETTA LUMZY
Defendant:
THE DA'S OFFICE, LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE TEAM, MEDICAL EXAMINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uber Driver Partner Emery v. Uber Technologies Inc, et al
as 21-1710
Defendant / Appellee:
UBERS SENIOR MANAGEMENT, IN PERSONAL OR OFFICIAL CAPACITY WITH UBER, RAISER LLC, A SUBSIDARY OF UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., UBER RIDER JAMES, PICKED UP IN BELMAR AREA OF THE JERSEY SHORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UBER DRIVER PARTNER EMERY
UBER DRIVER PARTNER EMERY v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC. et al
as 3:2020cv05156
Defendant:
UBER'S INVESTIGATION TEAM AND MANAGERS THEREOF, UBER RIDER "JAMES", UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
UBER DRIVER PARTNER EMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cormican v. Investigation Team
as 6:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Cormican
Defendant:
Investigation Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie LordMaster v. Clarke
as 16-6884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARKE, Director of DOC, ROBINSON, Chief of DOC Operations, BARKSDALE, Warden (Red Onion Supermax) and others
Curtis Jackson, Jr. v. City of Houston, et al
as 12-20003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS EARL JACKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON, Office of the Mayor, Annise D. Parker and City Council Members all in Official Capacities, C. A. MCCLELLAND, Chief, HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
