Cases 1 - 10 of 4,011
Carter v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
T'von Maurice Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff Antoinette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Irving, et al.
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Carla Wade
Defendant:
Antionette Irving and John Doe Defendants 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving B. Weiser v. Bogdan Tomescu et al
as 8:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Irving B. Weiser
Defendant:
Bogdan Tomescu, Steven Monroy and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ESTATE OF CONCEPCION TALAVERA et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04841
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF CONCEPCION TALAVERA and IRVING TAVERES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Winn v. Irving et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Trevelle Alexander Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Antionette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Springer et al
as 3:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Carrie Alexander
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Provident Group-Irving Properties LLC v. Austin Commercial LP
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Provident Group-Irving Properties LLC
Defendant:
Austin Commercial LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
US v. Medina, et al
as 24-1282
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
EDGAR MEDINA, ALIJAH PARSONS, ANDRES GARAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
