Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
D.S. et al v. Bainbridge Island School District
as 3:2020cv05140
Plaintiff:
P.S. and D.S.
Defendant:
Bainbridge Island School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Miles v. Rhode Island School of Design
as 1:2019cv00519
Plaintiff:
John Miles
Defendant:
Rhode Island School of Design
Interested Party:
Jane Doe and Mary Roe
Petitioner:
George Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
GUILFORD COLLEGE et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, THE NEW SCHOOL, GUILFORD COLLEGE and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Amicus Curiae:
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BENNINGTON COLLEGE, ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jane Doe v. Rhode Island School of Design
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rhode Island School of Design
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JANE DOE v. RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
as 2:2017cv01659
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shride v. Soltman et al
as 2:2016cv01678
Plaintiff:
Kimm Shride
Defendant:
Michael Soltman and Vashon Island School District #402
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
