Cases 71 - 80 of 183
Ellis v. Fox
as 3:2017cv07349
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Ellis
Defendant:
Robert Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Tuolumne County et al
as 1:2017cv01354
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Wilson
Defendant:
Tuolumne County, City of Sonora, James Mele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Ellis et al
as 9:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Juan Samuel Perez
Defendant:
Thomas J Ellis, Stacey F Hendrix, Michael R Cockerham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Chaney et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Avery Wayne Johnston
Defendant:
J Chaney, Franklin Leron Graham, J Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'ALESSANDRO v. COKER et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOUIS D'ALESSANDRO, III
Defendant:
J COKER, SCHROCK, J ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Ellis v. S Ludlum, et al
as 16-4176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerry J. Ellis
Defendant - Appellee:
S Ludlum, CCS, Dental Assistant, J Stieve, CCS, B Gray, Former CCS Employee and others
Jerry Ellis v. Larry May, et al
as 16-4047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerry J. Ellis
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry May, Ex-Chief Deputy Director, Wendy Kelley, Director, Grant Harris, Deputy Director and others
USA v. James DeFazio, et al
as 16-16922
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES P. DEFAZIO
Defendant:
KATHLEEN J. ELLIS, CITIBANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Ellis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Ellis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jamgotchai, et al v. State Horse Racing Commission et al
as 1:2016cv02035
Defendant:
State Horse Racing Commission, Thomas Chuckas, Jr. , Russell C. Redding and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jamgotchian and Eric Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
