Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shannon v. Hale et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Shecorey D. Shannon
Defendant:
Michael J. Hale and Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hale v. E.J.H. Construction, Inc.
as 4:2023cv11742
Plaintiff:
Earl J Hale
Defendant:
E.J.H. Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
James v. East Baton Rouge City Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James and Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Watkins v. Hale
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
GeneDeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bueno, Jr. v. Nigrini et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Victor Bueno, Jr.
Defendant:
Jay M. Nigrini, J. Hale, Schuylkill County Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Clark
as 22-30806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael A. James
Defendant / Appellee:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
Hicks v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hicks
Defendant:
Judge David J. Hale, Judge Benjamin Beaton, Judge Claria Horn Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, Conner A. James, Michael A James, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
