Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Henriquez v. Lilly et al
as 9:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
Ramon Henriquez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilly, Captain Thomas, Lieutenant P. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANarchy Craft Brewery v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm
as 21-50195
Defendant / Appellant:
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Michael S. Adkins, Jason E. Boatright and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CANarchy Craft Brewery Collective, L.L.C.
CANarchy Craft Brewery Collective, LLC v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Jason E. Boatright, Kevin J. Lilly, Ida Clement Steen and others
Plaintiff:
CANarchy Craft Brewery Collective, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Lillis v. Norwegian Cruise Lines
as 19-2391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. LILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES
J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01104
Defendant:
Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc. and Storm Construction, LLC
Plaintiff:
J. Lilly, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Lillis v. Norwegian Cruise Lines et al
as 2:2017cv12714
Plaintiff:
David J. Lillis
Defendant:
Norwegian Cruise Lines, Bret Berman, Frank Del Rio and others
LILLY v. CLELAND et al
as 2:2016cv00677
Plaintiff:
CATHY J. LILLY
Defendant:
THOMAS CLELAND and REBECCA CLELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lillie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lillie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joiner v. Jackson, City of et al
as 2:2014cv13388
Plaintiff:
Diana Joiner
Defendant:
Jackson, City of, Jackson, County of, M Galbreath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. CONROY et al
as 2:2013cv01560
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GEORGE E. CONROY , WILLIAM R. POSTON , ROBIN BERGSTROM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
