Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Gary DeWitt Odom
Defendant:
FNU Carvajal, J. Baltazar, FNU Garrido and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Stanard v. Maria Dy, et al
as 21-35582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT A. STANARD, AKA Robert Allen Stanard
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA DY, Doctor, FDC SeaTac, DAN SPROUL, Warden, FDC SeaTac, K. MARTINEZ, Physician's Assistant, FDC SeaTac and others
Michael Gordon v. J Baltazar
as 21-15976
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Respondent / Appellee:
J BALTAZAR, Warden
Clark v. USA
as 21-10552
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU McManus, Associate Warden, Stephen A. Bayer, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Anthony Clark
Boyd v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv01004
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, J Baltazar, I Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLean v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Sonya Cole, Cathy Cutwright, Rodney Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Lenroy McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Gordon v. USDC-AZT
as 21-70768
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Not Classified By Court:
J BALTAZAR, Warden and In re: MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
McCollom v. Garbarini et al
as 2:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Rosemary Stiles, J Yates, R Poyner and others
Plaintiff:
Bradly McCollom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarracino v. Baltazar, et al
as 21-2004
Respondent / Appellee:
J. BALTAZAR, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Petitioner / Appellant:
PETER ALLEN SARRACINO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
