Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Meza v. Baker et al
as 7:2012cv04430
Plaintiff:
Luis Meza
Defendant:
Mitchell J. Baker and Baker, Leshko, Saline & Blosser, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59274
Plaintiff:
RALPH J. BAKER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BAKER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv67175
Plaintiff:
EARL J. BAKER
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01868
Plaintiff:
Robert J Baker, II , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. H. J. Baker & Bro., Inc.
as 6:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Nelson D. Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
H. J. Baker & Bro., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker-Shreve v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03576
Plaintiff:
Darlene J. Baker-Shreve
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Baker v. Patterson Medical Supply, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Baker
Defendant:
Patterson Medical Supply, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Dyna-Life Products, Inc. and Valentine International, Ltd.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Patterson Medical Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAKER et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv60854
Plaintiff:
MATHEW J. BAKER and AGNES BAKER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker-Shreve v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Darlene J. Baker-Shreve
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER et al v. RIDDLE
as 3:2010cv00311
Plaintiff:
TERRI A. BAKER , MICHAEL J. BAKER , GERRY D. IRVINE and others
Defendant:
LAWRENCE RIDDLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
