Cases 1 - 10 of 67
CHI v. ROAD HUGGERS TRUCKING LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
SHENGLI CHI
Defendant:
ROAD HUGGERS TRUCKING LLC and EDWARD J. BARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Barker et al
as 0:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mel Contreras
Defendant:
J Barker and Hennipen County Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson, Kirk v. Buesgen, Chris et al
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Buesgen, J. Barker, L. Sukowaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05041
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson, John Ackley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson, John Ackley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00833
Plaintiff:
Abramson, Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
BARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35779
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J BARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Precythe et al
as 2:2021cv04031
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Barker, Nathan Dabney Rogers, Daniel McCleary and others
Defendant:
MO DOC Dept. of Probation & Parole, Missouri Department of Corrections and Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin BarkerIn re: Kevin Barker
as 20-4331
Respondent:
NORM ROBINSON, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN J. BARKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
