Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Keller v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00093
Respondent: USA, DOEs 1-1000, Moes, Does, Roes, U.S. Vessel, and Third Party Libelees, Regional Director and others
Defendant: T Stuteville, FNU Alsobrooks, FNU Daniels and others
Petitioner: Daniel E Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeremy Ned v. Dallas Jones, et al
as 18-40559
Petitioner - Appellant: JEREMY HEATH NED
Respondent - Appellee: DALLAS JONES, Warden of FCC Beaumont Medium and J. CASTANEDA, Warden of FCI Big Springs
Keller v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00161
Plaintiff: Daniel E Keller
Defendant: usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Castaneda
as 1:2017cv00161
Petitioner: Jeffrey Childs
Respondent: J Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00129
Plaintiff: Daniel E Keller
Defendant: USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zuniga v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv01774
Plaintiff: Manuel Zuniga
Defendant: Mesa Police Department , L Christopher, C Magee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vaughn v. Castaneda et al
as 1:2017cv00039
Petitioner: Barry Marcel Vaughn
Respondent: J Castaneda, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. Castaneda
as 1:2017cv00037
Petitioner: Johann Jordan
Respondent: J Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keller v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff: Daniel E Keller
Defendant: USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 4:2017cv00106
Plaintiff: Daniel E Keller
Defendant: USA, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?