Cases 1 - 10 of 439
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Johnson v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Smith v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Burger Mgmt Systems WA, Inc., et al v. Seawend, LTD, et al
as 24-3148
Plaintiff:
BURGER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WASHINGTON, INC. and SMS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Defendant:
SEAWEND, LTD, CEDAR ENTERPRISES, INC., J. DAVID KARAM and others
John v. Bolinder et al
as 1:2024cv20348
Plaintiff:
J. David John
Defendant:
Megan Marie Bolinder, Douglas Schrantz, Kristin Pawlik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCullum v. Green
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Christopher McCullum
Respondent:
J. David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tombragel v. Oral & Facial Surgery Associates, Drs. Perry, Morrison and Waters, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Teresa Tombragel
Defendant:
ORAL & FACIAL SURGERY ASSOCIATES, DRS. PERRY, MORRISON AND WATERS, LLC, Dennis Perry, James D Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
Whiteman v. Roundstone et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
LeWarren Whiteman
Defendant:
J. David Roundstone, Doris LittleWolf, Calvin Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
