Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hicks v. Richardson
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tyrone J. Hicks
Defendant:
LT Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv04577
Plaintiff:
Lem Douglas Vaughan, III
Defendant:
Chief J. Hicks, Medical Mrs. Bell, Officials K. Hornberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
BARKSDALE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
ETIENNE BARKSDALE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY IRWIN and OFFICER J. HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazil v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv03921
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Brazil, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief J. Hicks, Correctional Officer Tutherow and Chief Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hicks v. Yeh et al
as 3:2022cv06865
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hicks
Defendant:
Doctor Michael Yeh, Nay Aung, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Bien et al
as 3:2019cv01137
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hicks
Defendant:
Secretary California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld, LLC and Michael W. Bien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Meadows et al
as 5:2018ct03267
Defendant:
M. Meadows, J. Hicks, Nurse Lezcak and others
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Milwaukee County Jail
as 2:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
Jamarr J Hicks
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON WEST et al
as 4:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA STATE PRISON WEST, STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Nelson v. J. Hicks, et al
as 17-12600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. HICKS, FOREMAN, ALKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
