Cases 51 - 60 of 137
Silas v. Rose et al
as 4:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Steve Silas
Defendant:
R. Rose and J. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson, Kendall et al v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2017cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kendall D. Gipson
Defendant:
Jon E. Litscher , Cathy Jess, Gary Boughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Albin Family Revocable Living Trust et al v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc
as 5:2016cv00910
Plaintiff:
Albin Family Revocable Living Trust , Jerry K Archer , Stephen T Arrington and others
Defendant:
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Payne et al
as 4:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Clinton J. Payne, Michael Lombard, Adam Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkwood v. Payne et al
as 1:2015cv01471
Plaintiff:
Earnest Kirkwood
Defendant:
J Payne, McLean County Medical Staff, McLean County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv02299
Plaintiff:
Rex Payne and Betty J Payne
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant, Prison Guard, Logan Correctional Center and EDDIE J. PAYNE, Prison Guard, Pinckneyville Prison
Payne v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 8:2014cv01960
Plaintiff:
J. Payne
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and CBRE Technical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
