Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LaChance v. TruGolf Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2026cv00119
Plaintiff:
Parker LaChance
Defendant:
TruGolf Holdings Inc, Christopher Jones, B Shaun Limbers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Williams v. Newrez LLC
as 1:2026cv00277
Plaintiff:
Riley Cleveland Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Newrez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
lachance v. TruGolf Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2026cv00695
Plaintiff:
parker lachance
Defendant:
TruGolf Holdings Inc, Christopher Jones, B Shaun Limbers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
In Re: Fosu
as 26-1844
Petitioner:
LOUIS KWAME FOSU
Respondent:
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND, UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF TRUSTEES, DAVID M. DOOLEY, former President, URI Board of Trustees, in the individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James Riley v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 26-2836
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. RILEY, DEDRP
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Dennis Riley v. Telfair SP Warden
as 26-12519
Petitioner:
DENNIS RILEY
Respondent:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN
JOHNSON v. RILEY et al
as 1:2026cv02582
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIE JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREG RILEY, MICHAEL LEDUC, KEYBANK CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Lear Corporation
as 2:2026cv00593
Plaintiff:
John Riley
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Metropolis Big John Super Store, Inc. v. M/V BROOKE MCKENZIE et al
as 5:2026cv00207
Plaintiff:
Metropolis Big John Super Store, Inc.
Defendant:
M/V BROOKE MCKENZIE, M/V Charles L. Strait, M/V CHRISTOPHER D WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
