Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sewell v. American Express
as 1:2023cv03573
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Sewell
Defendant:
American Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Sewell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Theodis Sewell and Theodis J Sewell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sewell et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 8:2021cv02104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris, Andrea Sewell and Andrea J. Sewell
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Harris et al v. mayorkas et al
as 8:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Crhistopher Harris and Andrea J Sewell
Defendant:
mayorkas and Ur Jaddou Medoza
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Edwards v. Sewell (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00079
Defendant:
J. Sewell
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Edwards, DeAngelo Donterious Edwards and DeAngelo Edwards-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEWELL JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv03757
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J SEWELL JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sewell v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv13129
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandra J. Sewell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hardy v. Crow et al
as 2:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hardy
Defendant:
John Crow, J. Sewell and Correctional Officer Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Sewell et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00918
Plaintiff:
Cadarius J. Holland
Defendant:
J. Sewell and Warden McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Frazier v. Clyde Knowlton, et al
as 13-13195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CLYDE KNOWLTON, ROBERT J. SEWELL and ANTHONY KATHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
