Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 243
McWilliams v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff: Rahim McWilliams
Defendant: John R. Baldwin, Roberta Fews, Wendy Wavarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2017cv00303
Plaintiff: Betty J. Simmons
Defendant: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
as 1:2016cv10879
Plaintiff: Timothy J Simmons
Defendant: Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Simmons v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03842
Plaintiff: Thomas J Simmons
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as AZ/2:16-cv-03842
Plaintiff: Thomas J Simmons
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Simmons et al v. The City of Orlando et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv01909
Plaintiff: Cleatous Joseph Simmons and Rhonda J. Simmons
Defendant: The City of Orlando , Jeffrey Backhaus , Daniel Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Simmons et al
as 3:2016mc03756
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ernest J. Simmons
Garnishee: Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Michael Simmons v. USA
as 16-6108
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL J. SIMMONS
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Marques Simmons
as 16-14186
Petitioner: In re: MARQUES J. SIMMONS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Artez Simmons v. Warden, et al
as 16-11197
Petitioner - Appellant: ARTEZ J. SIMMONS
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?