Cases 61 - 70 of 103
McElroy v. Muniz et al
as 5:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, Pam Jones, Damon Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Muniz et al
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, Beard, Pam Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. American Traffic Solutions,Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv22696
Plaintiff:
Richard J Stone , Class Members 1 , Class Members 2 and others
Defendant:
American Traffic Solutions,Inc. , American Traffic Solutions, LLC , American Traffic Solutions Consolidated, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv01154
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Robbie Johnson, Greg Gossett, Dave Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
Josephine J. Stone
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Stone v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20835
Plaintiff:
Francis J Stone
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stone v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20835
Plaintiff:
Francis J Stone
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Hecking v. New Hampshire Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Katherine Barger, Tim Beaupre and others
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stone et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as INN/3:13-cv-00612
Plaintiff:
Margaret J Stone and Mickey W Stone
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
