Cases 11 - 20 of 429
WASHINGTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT J. WALKER, SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Palmore v. J. Estrada, et al
as 23-12438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL PALMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ESTRADA and J. WALKER
WALLACE v. OBERLANDER et al.
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT D. OBERLANDER, E. DEPUTY MONGELLOZZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar Folk v. BOP, et al
as 22-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Employee's and Medical Staff and DAVID J. BALL
Defendant:
T. ANDRESS, JOHN T. BURN, C. CAIN and others
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmore v. Estrada et al
as 8:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Michael Palmore
Defendant:
J. Estrada and J. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Penton v. Layton Johnson, et al
as 22-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY PENTON
Defendant / Appellant:
LAYTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
S. HUBARD, K. POOL, J. WALKER and others
(PC) Mwasi v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
T. Blanchard, Huu Nguyen, Urbano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04035
Plaintiff:
Eric Demond Russell
Defendant:
Captain Adams, Sergeant Golden, Correctional Officer Mrs. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Doran J Walker
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
