Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bowles Funeral Services, LLC et al v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bowles Funeral Services, LLC , James Bowles and Peter Bowles
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis et al v. Valsamis, Inc.
as 1:2016cv20517
Defendant:
Valsamis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mayberry , Diane Tucker , Ana Santa Ana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
BOWLES et al v. WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP et al
as 2:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOWLES and BARBARA BOWLES
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, SETERUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryder et al v. Bowling
as 2:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Ryder , Chad James Tacy and James Cody Ryder
Defendant:
Kevin James Bowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael James Bowles v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2014cv00841
Plaintiff:
Michael James Bowles
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Does, Det. Gary Esmond and others
Davis et al v. Valsamis, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00038
Defendant:
Valsamis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mayberry , Diane Tucker , Ana Santa Ana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Alvarez et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2014cv20479
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alvarez, Jr , Cecilia Alvarez , Kathy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-41157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv04651
Plaintiff:
James Bowling
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
