Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smalls v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv03713
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smalls
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriff's Office, James Carter, III and Allan R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter et al v. Talbot Park Apartments et al
as 2:2020cv00483
Plaintiff:
James Carter and Leslie Sands
Defendant:
Talbot Park Apartments and Newport One Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smalls v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2020cv02743
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smalls
Defendant:
Deputy James Carter, III, Charleston County and Charleston County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aurora Julian Rockefeller v. James Carter
as 16-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AURORA JULIAN ROCKEFELLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES CARTER, former U.S. President, CIA AGENTS and U.S. CONSULS, at Manila U.S. Embassy during Carter Administration
Bailey et al v. Rinehart Tower Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv03388
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Bailey, Jr. and Bessie A. Bailey
Defendant:
Rinehart Tower Service, Inc. and Tyson James Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. President of South Africa et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
President of South Africa, Iraq, Kuwait and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Carter et al
as 1:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
James Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rockefeller v. Carter et al
as 2:2014cv07528
Plaintiff:
Aurora Julian Rockefeller
Defendant:
James Carter, CIA Agents and U.S. Consuls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv31009
Plaintiff:
Luchina Shields and James Carter
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
