Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Waller v. USA
as 1:2026cv00055
Petitioner:
James Clay Waller, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Karrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv01973
Plaintiff:
James Clay Karrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Patterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv00932
Plaintiff:
Cristine Patterson, Florence Acquasanta, Doriesa Adams and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Patterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv00141
Plaintiff:
Cristine Patterson, Florence Acquasanta, Doriesa Adams and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Tyco Fire Products, LP, Chemguard, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Patterson et al v. 3M Company et al
as ALN/2:25-cv-00141
Plaintiff:
Cristine Patterson, Florence Acquasanta, Doriesa Adams and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Tyco Fire Products, LP, Chemguard, Inc and others
Karrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
James Clay Karrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bexley v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
James Clay Bexley
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kerby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
James Clay Kerby, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.