Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv06074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brown v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2025cv04741
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Brown
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Blake R Barron, Jesus Pedro Bojorquez and others
Unknown:
Monterey County Sheriff-Coroner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mourning v. Downtown Memphis Commission et al
as 2:2023cv02784
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mourning
Defendant:
Downtown Memphis Commission, CITY OF MEMPHIS and James Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HARDEN v. USA
as 4:2022cv00072
Petitioner:
JAMES HARDEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ADESHINA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
YINKA ADESHINA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL J. CLINTON, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADESHINA v. MUSK et al
as 4:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
YINKA A ADESHINA
Defendant:
ELON MUSK, WESLEY SNIPES, JAMIE FOXX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27451
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Harden et al
as 3:2020cv00390
Defendant:
C/O Morris, Sgt. James Townsend, Rattliff and others
Plaintiff:
Antwon Darrell Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
