Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2026cv00427
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2026cv00707
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07427
Plaintiff:
Larry James Jackson, III
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson, III v. Bisignano
as 8:2026cv02384
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Jackson, III
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv01638
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JACKSON v. JESSE et al
as 1:2026cv00741
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON
Defendant:
CO JESSE, MAJOR MICHELLE, CO HELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. Hoover
as 1:2026cv01423
Petitioner:
James Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson et al v. Harper General Hospital et al
as 2:2026cv11998
Plaintiff:
Patrice Jackson and James Jackson
Defendant:
Harper General Hospital and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dunbar v. Jackson et al
as 1:2026cv04752
Plaintiff:
Janis Lavern Dunbar
Defendant:
Curtis James Jackson, III, Curtis Jackson, Joy Daphne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
