Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00154
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Gorneleh v. City of Kettering et al
as 3:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Nuponu Gorneleh
Defendant:
Christopher T Herman, Don Patterson, City of Kettering and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hodge v. Blount County et al (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Judy R Hodge
Defendant:
Blount County, James L Berrong, Henry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Long v. Joe Barrett
as 15-2232
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES LONG
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE BARRETT, Warden
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Barrett
as 2:2014cv11260
Respondent:
Joe Barrett
Petitioner:
Edward James Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Long et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv14810
Plaintiff:
James Long and Judy Long
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee for the Indymac INDX Mortgage Trust 2006-AR4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Long, et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registrati, et al
as 12-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LONG and JUDY LONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ONE WEST BANK, FSB, INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES and others
Brian Long, et al v. Captain Tony Ranieri
as 11-4222
Plaintiff:
CONNOR JAMES LONG and NATHANIEL THOMAS LONG
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN JOSEPH LONG
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN TONY RANIERI, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
