Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jerry Smith v. Indiana Parole Board, et al
as 23-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY A. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, G. HORTH, THOR R. MILLER and others
Smith v. Indiana Parole Board et al
as 3:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
Indiana Parole Board, G Horth, Thor Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M. Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Herman Quay, Paul Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PASCHALL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE PASCHALL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
CLINTON RILEY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, GWEN HORTH, THOR MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAFFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03194
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHAFFER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer, et al, v. Health Acquisition Company LLC, et al,
as 1:2021mc22371
Defendant:
Health Acquisition Company LLC, et al,
Plaintiff:
James Shaffer, et al,
James Shaffer, et al. v. Health Acquisition Company et al.
as 3:2021mc00038
Plaintiff:
James Shaffer, et al.
Defendant:
Health Acquisition Company et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
PASCHALL v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
DEVYN DICE, ROBERT CARTER, GWENDOLYN HORTH and others
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE PASCHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
