Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Yerks v. Tegels et al
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jammie L Yerks
Defendant:
Elizabeth Tegels, Dr Galliwalla, Dr Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonse v. Rickard
as 3:2024cv00855
Petitioner:
Jammy Alphonse
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collier v. Love et al
as 2:2024cv11213
Plaintiff:
Jammie Collier
Defendant:
Christopher Love, Kenneth Monroe, United States Marshal Service and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Sumrall v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 5:2024cv10896
Plaintiff:
Jammie Sumrall
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Morrison v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rev. Patrick Hugh Ronald Morrison
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Heidi Steward, Jammie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noyes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jammy Noyes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rush v. Burton et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Kendra Burton and Jammi Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
