Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lichy v. County of Cattaraugus et al
as 6:2023cv06691
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lichy
Defendant:
County of Cattaraugus, Timothy S. Whitscomb, Eric J Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lichy v. County of Cattaraugus et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lichy
Defendant:
County of Cattaraugus, Timothy S. Whitscomb, Eric J Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buttrey v. Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv01442
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Buttrey
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Sarah R. Lund, Jason Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. City of Oakwood et al
as 3:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jason Thompson and 2408 Hillview, LLC
Defendant:
City of Oakwood and Ethan Kroger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thompson v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv03015
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Klamath County School District, Kevin McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waits et al v. Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Waits and Judy Ann Chockley
Defendant:
Dickson County, Tennessee, Jason Thompson and Daniel Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00843
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
