Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bailey v. Dish TV et al
as 3:2019cv00977
Plaintiff:
Willis Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
Dish TV and JEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Jacksonville, Florida et al v. Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
as 1:2019cv03234
Plaintiff:
JEA and City of Jacksonville, Florida
Defendant:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poland v. Prairie Meadows Management NE, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00233
Defendant:
HSH Management Holdings, LLC, HSH Holdings, LLC, HSH-JEA Properties, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Poland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Municipal Electric Authority o v. JEA
as 19-11373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AUTHORITY OF GEORGIA
Defendant / Appellee:
JEA
Eckard v. Lee
as 2:2019cv00429
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Eckard
Defendant:
Jea Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim et al v. Taimanglo et al
as 1:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jea Yong Ma, Jin Man Kim, Choi and others
Defendant:
Joseph L. Edquilane, Chung Kuo Insurance Company, Ltd., Does 1 Through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roger Hillygus, et al v. Frances Doherty, et al
as 19-15137
Defendant / Appellee:
JEA SENIOR LIVING JERRY ERWIN ASS. INC., JOEL BENNETT BARBER, RYAN J. MCELHINNEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER HILLYGUS, DEBBIE HILLYGUS, HERBERT EUGENE HILLYGUS and others
Defendant:
WASHOE COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY
City of Jacksonville, Florida et al v. Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
as 3:2018cv01174
Plaintiff:
JEA and City of Jacksonville, Florida
Defendant:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia v. JEA
as 1:2018cv04295
Plaintiff:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
Defendant:
JEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
