Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
US v. De Jesus-Ortiz
as 23-1936
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
YAN CARLOS DE JESUS-ORTIZ, a/k/a Cepi, a/k/a Cepi El Escudo
Yolanda Irving v. The City of Raleigh
as 23-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YOLANDA IRVING, individually and as the natural parent of J.I., JUWAN HARRINGTON, CYDNEEA HARRINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH, OMAR ABDULLAH, Officer, in their individual capacity, WILLIAM ROLFE, Sergeant, in their individual capacity and others
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05759
Plaintiff:
JESUS ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Irma De Jesus Ortiz v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-10748
Petitioner:
IRMA DE JESUS ORTIZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Green v. Neely et al
as 1:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Green
Defendant:
Donald K Neely and Jesus Ortiz
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2022cv01574
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ortiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HURTADO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36259
Plaintiff:
JESUS ORTIZ HURTADO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ortiz-Melendez
as 21-40432
Defendant / Appellant:
Israel De Jesus Ortiz-Melendez, also known as Carlos Ramon Ortiz
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jesus Ortiz Paz v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2020cv01486
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, City of San Bernardino, Officer Matt Guzzino and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ortiz Paz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
