Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Martinez-Gonzalez et al v. Catholic Schools of the Archdioceses of San Juan Pension Plan et al
as 3:2016cv02077
Plaintiff:
Ivette M. Martinez-Gonzalez , Elia M. Fontanet-Batista , Maria Isabel Fernandez-Garcia and others
Defendant:
Catholic Schools of the Archdioceses of San Juan Pension Plan , Samuel Soto , Juan Santa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Abernathy v. Becon Construction Company, Inc
as 1:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
Mary Annette Abernathy , All Plaintiffs , Isidora Abreu Ventura and others
Defendant:
Becon Construction Company, Inc, Valente Zarraga and Kenneth Ray Zeno
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Milton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ortiz-Rivas v. USA
as 2:2014cv01900
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ivan De Jesus Ortiz-Rivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Ortiz v. Saltsman
as 13-1823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesus Ortiz
Defendant - Appellee:
Saltsman, Mr. Clayton and Officer Anderson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Saltsman et al
as 9:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ortiz
Defendant:
Saltsman, Clayton and Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Saltsman et al
as 1:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ortiz
Defendant:
Saltsman, Clayton and Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glorismel Centeno v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70398
Petitioner:
GLORISMEL JESUS CENTENO, AKA Jesus Ortiz-Perez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
