Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Brown v. Harmon
as 1:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Tommy Joe Brown
Defendant:
Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Grisham et al
as 2:2021cv00656
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Stone
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, State of New Mexico Department of Corrections, Secretary of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWNING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22516
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE BROWNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Brown
as 21-7021
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: BOBBY JOE BROWN, JR.
Thomas E Andrews v. Mathew J. Michalski et al
as 8:2021cv00787
Defendant:
Roes, Christoper Baysinger, Russell Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore v. Copiah County Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jacques R. Gilmore
Defendant:
Nadean Sutton, Byrom Swilley, Charlene Hilliard and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Copiah County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jacques R. Gilmore
Defendant:
Nadean Sutton, Byrom Swilley, Charlene Hilliard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Swanson v. Oregon State Fair et al
as 3:2020cv02076
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
Wayne Petersen, Joe Brown and Oregon State Fair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heard v. Lubbock County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00203
Plaintiff:
Travis James Heard
Defendant:
Joe Brown, Lubbock County Jail and 5 Star Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65797
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
