Cases 61 - 70 of 190
Novex Biotech, LLC v. Herbal Research, Inc.
as 0:2017cv61863
Plaintiff:
Novex Biotech, LLC
Defendant:
Herbal Research, Inc. , John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Netti v. Ayers et al
as 5:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Grace Ann Netti
Defendant:
Christopher Ayers, John Iacona, Tim Furlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Doe et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dawson
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe, John #3 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
September Productions, Inc. v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv02828
Plaintiff:
September Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
John (1) Doe, John (2) Doe, John (3) Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Martinez-Cano v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03738
Defendant:
City of New York, John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Plaintiff:
Genoveva Martinez-Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06439
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, M Abernathy, D Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Rupert et al
as 6:2016cv00778
Plaintiff:
Johnny Fuentes
Defendant:
John Rupert, Jeffery Richardson, Brennan Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2016cv01476
Plaintiff:
MALONE and DARRYL MALONE
Defendant:
WILSON, LASHONDA WILSON, ZAPATA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 16-40665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female Texas Department of Criminal Justice Officer and others
King v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2016cv04016
Plaintiff:
Domintric King
Defendant:
Anita Alvarez, Robert Kowalski, John #1 Doe and others
Movant:
Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
