Cases 21 - 30 of 104
United States v. John Evans, Jr.
as 19-2231
Defendant / Appellant:
John W. Evans, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Evans v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03132
Plaintiff:
John S Evans
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Bates County Sheriff's Office/Jail et al
as 4:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
John W Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Bates County Jail Nurses - Medical, Parker, Bates County Sheriff's Office/Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Evans et al
as 2:2019cv02009
Plaintiff:
Marilyn T Brown and Jestin M Covington
Defendant:
John J Evans and Ruan Logistics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. United States Federal Reserve System et al
as 2:2018cv03251
Defendant:
United States Federal Reserve System and Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
John Kenneth Evans, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Great American E&S Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv02302
Plaintiff:
John Frederick Evans
Defendant:
Arizona's Best Home Care Corporation, Shavonna Sanders, HB2114 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Great American E&S Insurance Company v. HB2114 LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02189
Consolidated Plaintiff:
John Frederick Evans
Defendant:
HB2114 LLC, Arizona's Best Home Care Corporation, Shavonna Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Great American E&S Insurance Company
Consolidated Defendant:
Unknown Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zinter et al v. Salvaggio et al
as 5:2018cv00680
Plaintiff:
Russell Zinter, Jack Miller, James Mead and others
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe Goldman, Detective Jim Wells, Officer John Doe Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
