Cases 41 - 49 of 49
OSWALD v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAMERON OSWALD
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hofland v. Cyr, et al
as 11-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND, a/k/a R.B.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN P. CYR, BRUCE A. CARDELLO, SUSAN CARBON and others
Lighthouse Financial Group v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, plc et al
as 1:2011cv00398
Defendant:
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, plc , Lawrence K. Fish, Guy R. Whittaker and others
Movant:
Ethan Gold, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund , Bricklayers and Masons Local Union No. 5, Ohio Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Graham v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
John Cameron Graham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hofland v. Cyr, et al
as 10-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND, a/k/a R.B.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN P. CYR, BRUCE A. CARDELLO, SUSAN CARBON and others
Cameron-Honaker et al v. Arpino et al
as 1:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Susan Cameron-Honaker and John Cameron-Honaker & Family
Defendant:
Dee Arpino, Eleana Meyers, Meyers Crime Family and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cable et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2009cv00579
Plaintiff:
Reshelle Cable, Matthew Cadwell, Katie Coelho and others
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cable et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2009at00314
Plaintiff:
Reshelle Cable, Matthew Cadwell, Katie Coelho and others
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAMERON et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85970
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAMERON, JOHN CAMERON, JOHN CAMERON and others
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY (USA), INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
