Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Cameron v. Smith
as 2:2026cv01224
Petitioner:
Casey John Cameron
Respondent:
Troy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cameron v. Hayes et al
as 2:2026cv00535
Plaintiff:
Casey John Cameron
Defendant:
NP Hayes, Dr Daughtry and NP Trezbtowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
al-Taie v. Traveller et al
as 6:2025cv00362
Plaintiff:
Receiver Ferdose al-Taie
Defendant:
Shane Traveller, Kenneth Wiedrich, Kim Cravey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
SHI International Corp. v. Clutch Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2025cv00431
Plaintiff:
SHI International Corp.
Defendant:
Clutch Solutions, LLC, Christopher Clark, Amza Safi and others
Counter-Defendant:
Megan Thompson and SHI International Corp.
Counter-Claimant:
Clutch Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Campbell et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Venedia Larita Campbell and Martin Alan Smith, II
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Kyle Allen Williams, Paul Franz Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cameron v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
John Cameron
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
John CainIn re: John Cain
as 21-13241
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN CAMERON CAIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Agwu et al v. City and County of Denver, The, et al
as 1:2021cv02478
Plaintiff:
REBECCA AGWU, JESSE ANDERSEN, AZRIA ARROYO and others
Defendant:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, REECE HUNTER, ALFONSO CARRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Cain v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv23133
Plaintiff:
John Cameron Cain
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CAMERON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55780
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
