Cases 91 - 100 of 174
Campbell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04572
Plaintiff:
John Campbell
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through10 and Jeffrey Lehn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoefgen v. Smith et al
as 4:2014cv02195
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Hoefgen
Defendant:
Alan Smith , John Campbell, Jr , Donald Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23390
Plaintiff:
Doris June Campbell and John Campbell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Coffey et al
as 1:2014cv01860
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
Rex W. Coffey, John Campbell and Steven Vogt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL, ET AL. V. BERRIAN, ET AL.
as 2:2014cv01999
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAMPBELL and DENISE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
ROBERT BERRIAN , IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, LLC and IRON MOUNTAIN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rocha v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00007
Defendant:
Antonio Barton, Warden Brett Bement, Warden John Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Blanca E Rocha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24799
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Campbell and John Campbell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-24799
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Campbell and John Campbell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Dennis Campbell, et al v. USA, et al
as 13-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Dennis Campbell, et al v. United States Postal Service
as 13-3718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL
Plaintiff:
MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
