Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Curcio et al v. Demopoulos et al
as 1:2020cv05463
Defendant:
Stephen Malone, Michael Spinelli and Demos P. Demopoulos
Plaintiff:
John Curcio and Kenneth Barrett
Counter Defendant:
William Cassese
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Demopoulos et al v. Curcio et al
as 1:2020cv05441
Plaintiff:
Demos P. Demopoulos, Stephen Malone and Michael Spinelli
Defendant:
William Cassese, John Curcio and Kenneth Barrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Demopoulos et al v. Curcio et al
as 1:2020cv02151
Plaintiff:
Demos P. Demopoulos, Stephen Malone and Michael Spinelli
Defendant:
William Cassese, John Curcio and Kenneth Barrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Demopoulos et al v. Curio et al
as 2:2020cv01208
Plaintiff:
Demos P. Demopoulos, Stephen Malone and Michael Spinelli
Defendant:
William Cassese, John Curio, Kenneth Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Danielkiewicz et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 2:2018cv13599
Plaintiff:
Don Martin, Georgia Stamates, Nancy Leonti and others
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Curcio v. Stephen Schwartz
as 13-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CURCIO
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN SCHWARTZ
CURCIO et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00611
Plaintiff:
DENISE CURCIO and JOHN CURCIO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , ABC PROPERTY/BUILDING OWNERS/MANAGERS 1-5, DEF CORPORATIONS 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CURCIO v. SCHWARTZ
as 2:2012cv01190
Plaintiff:
JOHN CURCIO
Defendant:
STEPHEN SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curcio v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Gregory John Curcio
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
