Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Shaffer v. Kalamazoo County Administration et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Shaffer
Defendant:
Kalamazoo County Administration and John Curran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
CURRAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74068
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHN CURRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allison et al United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv01174
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wilson, Billy Davis, Debbie Henry and others
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017cv00530
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017mi00004
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curran v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06047
Plaintiff:
John Curran
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curran v. Hollingsworth
as 1:2013cv03863
Petitioner:
John Curran, III
Respondent:
Jordan R. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curran v. Hollingsworth
as 1:2013cv08780
Petitioner:
John Curran
Respondent:
Jordan R. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curran v. Conti Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv11049
Plaintiff:
John Curran
Defendant:
Conti Enterprises, Inc. and Conti Federal Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diego et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04011
Plaintiff:
Maria Diego and Javier Sanchez
Defendant:
City of New York , James Carroll, Karen Wuttke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
