Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WASHINGTON STREET, LLC v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv04374
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON STREET, LLC
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN D. MATTHEWS, CHARLES FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49501
Plaintiff:
JOHN D MATTHEWS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
International City Mortgage, Inc. v. Monica Diaz et al
as 2:2019cv04065
Plaintiff:
International City Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Monica Diaz, Does 1 through 5, inclusive and John D. Matthews
Shahryar Gilani v. John Matthews, et al
as 16-1689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shahryar Gilani
Defendant - Appellee:
Officer John D. Matthews, in his individual capacity, Officer Francis D. Collins, in his individual capacity, Alvin Brooks, in his official capacity as President and a member of the Board of Police Commissioners and others
Defendant:
David Kenner, in his official capacity as Secretary-Attorney and a member of the Board of Police Commissioners
Gilani v. Matthews et al
as 4:2014cv00630
Plaintiff:
Shahryar Gilani
Defendant:
Officer John D. Matthews and Officer Francis D. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Matthews, M.D. et al
as 4:2012cv00015
Defendant:
Central Carolina Surgical Eye Associates, P.A., John D. Matthews, M.D. and Surgical Eye Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Doris W. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Matthews v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
John D. Matthews
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Stephen Iyevbele, K. Scheimreif and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Iyevbele et al
as 3:2011cv00153
Petitioner:
John D. Matthews
Respondent:
FNU Riley
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
