Cases 11 - 20 of 34,364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shin v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Gloria H. Shin
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Color of law agent (including Municipalities) Jane and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SINGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
PRABHJOT SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Richard Kaul v. James Oetken
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JAMES PAUL OETKEN, in his personal and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
