Cases 61 - 70 of 209
Whitener v. The Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Chris Francis, Jane Doe 1, RCDC's Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dale Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goins v. Unit Manager Miller et al
as 7:2021cv00087
Defendant:
F. Duty, John Doe #1, Correctional Officer Mays and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Goins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. CRISCO et al
as 1:2021cv00102
Defendant:
DETENTION OFFICER, JEFFREY A. CRISCO, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
CATHY ANN SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childers v. Cherokee County Sheriff's Deputy et al
as 7:2021cv00313
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and Cherokee County Sheriff's Deputy
Plaintiff:
Samuel Trinity Childers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Childers v. Hicks et al
as 2:2021cv00238
Defendant:
Troy Anderson, A Cannon, John Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Trinity Childers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Deas v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv00143
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Canon, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Destiny Deas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Engelke et al
as 7:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, Nartarcha Gregg, Malissa Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Perritt et al
as 5:2020ct03376
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Brad Perritt, George W. Baysden, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. HURWITZ
as 6:2020cv04335
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
