Cases 1 - 10 of 313
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Edwards v. USA
as 24-10501
Petitioner:
JAMES JOHN EDWARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lohden v. Decker
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Edward Lohden, Jr.
Defendant:
Luke Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
James v. Nanos et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
John Edwards James, III
Respondent:
Christopher Nanos and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. Brietenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
John Edward Kirby
Respondent:
Warden Brietenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mitchell v. CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv02899
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Macomber, C. Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. City of Akron, Ohio et al.
as 5:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Ladamien Lavelle Malone
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio, City of Akron Police Department, John Edwards, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Butler v. Superintendent Stanley
as 23-7161
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BUTLER
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING SUPERINTENDENT STANLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
