Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sims-Lewis v. Potter et al
as 1:2016cv03480
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
John Potter, Baltimore City Police Department, Baltimore City Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. FIA Card Services NA et al
as 2:2012cv01722
Plaintiff:
John Potter
Defendant:
FIA Card Services NA , Bank of America Corporation and Budzik & Dynia LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Charles Dickerson v. TLC The Laser Eye Center
as 12-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BENJAMIN DICKERSON, a/k/a Ben, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOLLMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TLC THE LASER EYE CENTER INSTITUTE, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER CAROLINA, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER MADISON, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Monette et al
as 5:2011ct03017
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Defendant:
Jerry Monette, Nataile Stansford, John Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollman v. TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc et al
as 6:2010cv00685
Plaintiff:
John Hollman
Defendant:
TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc, TLC The Laser Center Carolina Inc, TLC The Laser Center Madison Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
