Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Ferguson v. Gomez et al
as 7:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Ray Ferguson
Defendant:
Marco Gomez, Y. Cortez and F Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Terrell
as 21-50354
Defendant / Appellant:
John Ray Edward Terrell, also known as John Ray Terrell
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Cheek v. Young
as 5:2021cv00024
Respondent:
S Young
Petitioner:
John Ray Cheek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13572
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheek v. US
as 20-11144
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Bayer, FNU Saladana, FNU Rameriz and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Ray Cheek
Cheek v. USA
as 20-11114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Ray Cheek
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Cheek v. United States
as 4:2020cv00991
Plaintiff:
John Cheek and John Ray Cheek
Defendant:
United States, FNU Williams, FNU Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Dynes v. Clark
as 1:2020cv01149
Petitioner:
John Ray Dynes
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Cheek v. Warden of Federal Medical Ctr, et al
as 20-10712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Ray Cheek
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden of Federal Medical Center, Federal Medical Center, Michael Carvajal and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
