Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 23-3312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JERI FEDERICKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols, Kathleen Nickol and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00769
Plaintiff:
Nichols, Bob Williams, Dale Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Ruiz v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
John Ruiz
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Milous Brown v. David Gray, et al
as 21-3386
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN RUIZ, Unit Manager, A-Unit, PATRICK HALEY, Institutional Inspector, DAVID W. GRAY, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILOUS BROWN
Yonna Acosta, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3617
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kyle Scruggs, Kris Douglas, Thomas Whitby and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jansen Ferguson, Darin Spurger, Thomas Holt and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
