Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Grooms v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al (TV3)
as 2:2012cv00373
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Armando Fontes, Tommy Large and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Elmer Grooms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stolle v. Kent State University et al
as 5:2012cv01488
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stolle
Defendant:
Kent State University, John Thornton, Richard Kolbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leija v. B&T Quality Foods, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv04157
Plaintiff:
Marcos Leija
Defendant:
B&T Quality Foods, LLC and John Thornton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Walsh-Rubio v. Thornton
as 11-2467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Doreen Walsh-Rubio
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellen Thornton, John Thornton, Emmet Walsh and others
Buck v. Myers, et al
as 11-4061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLEN BUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN RAND MYERS, WILLIAM H. BARRETT, Utah 3rd District Court Judge, TRACY BROUGHN, Salt Lake County Sheriff Deputy and others
Walsh-Rubio v. Thornton et al
as 1:2010cv03897
Plaintiff:
Doreen Walsh-Rubio
Defendant:
Ellen Thornton, John Thornton, Emmet Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz v. New York City et al
as 1:2007cv10706
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ortiz
Defendant:
New York City, Andrew Kenny, Joanne Green and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thornton v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 2:2007cv00211
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thorton v. Hall
as 3:2007cv00210
Petitioner:
Cody John Thornton
Respondent:
Guy Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Renfro et al v. Spartan Computer Services, Inc
as 2:2007cv02050
Plaintiff:
Roy Renfro, Roy Renfro, John Thornton and others
Defendant:
Spartan Computer Services, Inc, Spartan Computer Services, Inc, Jack Steenhausen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
