Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stanek v. Sarpy County et al
as 8:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
Megan M. Stanek
Defendant:
Sarpy County, Sarpy County Treasurer, Trace Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davidson v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
as 5:2016cv01928
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davidson
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, United HealthCare and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jonathan Davidson v. City of Stafford, Texas, et al
as 16-20217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF STAFFORD, TEXAS, BONNY KRAHN, Chief of Police, City of Stafford, Texas, HENRY GARCIA, Police Officer, City of Stafford, Texas and others
Davidson v. City of Stafford, Texas et al
as 4:2014cv03596
Defendant:
City of Stafford, Texas, Bonny Krahn, Henry Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Davidson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davidson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012xc00213
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davidson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Davidson et al
as 4:2011cv03997
Plaintiff:
Chris A. Sanchez
Defendant:
Jonathan Davidson, Jay Young, Donna Bouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Larsen
as 11-94
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Victor L. Larsen, Jr., Jonathan Davidson, Angel Cordero and others
Defendant - Appellant:
John Markou, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
