Cases 11 - 20 of 133
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Mendoza v. Shalom Home Care, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jose Mendoza
Defendant:
Shalom Home Care, Inc.
Mendoza Hernandez v. Garland
as 22-1198
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JOSE MENDOZA HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo et al v. Mendoza Auto Repair, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03861
Plaintiff:
Bladimir Castillo and Francelys Espinoza Cruz
Defendant:
Mendoza Auto Repair, Inc. and Jose Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Benavidez et al v. Tri-State Plumbing & Heating, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03779
Plaintiff:
Norlan Benavidez, Eden Antonio Tino Meneces, Marvel Jose Mendoza Perez and others
Defendant:
Tri-State Plumbing & Heating, Inc. d/b/a Tri-State Plumbing and Feng Quan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Javier Mendoza
as 22-50079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAVIER GARIBAY MENDOZA, AKA Javier Garibay Mendoza-Romero, AKA Jose Mendoza-Romero
Mendoza v. Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jose Mendoza
Defendant:
Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Yeager et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Valerie Yeager, Clifford Yeager and Kathleen Yeager
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Jose Mendoza, Unknown Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
